existing alternatives to incineration and operated:
1) reducing waste at source by recycling di contenitori (acqua, latte, vino, shampo, detersivi…. ) e compostaggio domestico. Ciò riduce sia la quota organica destinata alle discariche sia il percolato che infiltra e inquina la falda acquifera) . Il razionale del resto non dovrebbe essere preoccuparsi di come eliminare i rifiuti non riciclabili ma di come fare per non produrli.
2 ) Raccolta differenziata che permette il successivo riciclo.
3 ) Riciclo e compostaggio , così l’organico è isolato è avviato alle filiere di riciclo per la conversione in fertilizzanti.
4 ) a questo punto la quota non riciclabile è smaltibile with the mechanical biological treatment or MBT cold, whose value is the conversion of waste according to its nature. Techniques are not the prerogative of a mysterious alien culture but take advantage of both aerobic treatments with air blowers that eliminate the putrescible fraction, both the anaerobic population more resistant to oxidation and bio which among other things allows conversion into biogas (methane and carbon dioxide).
Now that biogas could be used for energy purposes is not science fiction, since they already are doing in Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Holland, where the gas is injected directly into the city distribution network.
L’energia prodotta dal riciclaggio di carta è 9,49 GJ/tonn, se incenerita invece ne produce 2,25 GJ/tonn , il riciclaggio di polietene ne produce 64 ,27 GJ/tonn, se incenerito 6,30 GJ/tonn, le altre plastiche riciclate ne producono 52,9 GJ/tonn contro i 4,76 dell’incenerimento. Il ciclo riuso/riciclaggio/ compostaggio salva 3-4 volte più energia di quella ottenuta dall’incenerimento. C’è chi vuole sbattersene se l’inceneritore fa venire il cancro, va bene allora ragioniamo in termini di energia/profitto : ha senso incenerire o riciclare?
La gran parte dei soldi spesi nell’inceneritore servono to feed all the sophisticated and expensive facilities that are needed to operate the plant, other than those spent on creating alternative jobs in most if not all other labor required to set in motion the chain that operates to transform and stabilize property chemical waste avoiding fermentation or decomposition (according to the cycle described above). We want to beat even the energy issue, all right then think in terms of profit and expenses (in which the more reason and better understand): to a collective sense to incinerate or recycle?
How ironic Paul Connett, professor of chemistry at St.Lawrence University New York, in a nutshell eats advertising on consumption, consumption will move to the philosophy of disposable waste wheel come unmanageable, to adjust the hours if there was a law bulimia consumer good pollution levels would be inversely proportional to the level of public participation, but in fact govern a bad law that the level of pollution depends on the level of corruption and speculation .... Expect mountains of waste.
The question is not how to dispose of the waste, the question is whether there is interest to dispose of.
From an economic standpoint incinerators are a bargain only because receiving state contributions, due to the Italian legislation allows to take that renewable energy produced by burning any type of waste. It follows that the logic that goes to cover, regulate and investigate these activities is that of maximum profit and minimum control (taming and placing restrictions on the availability of data, covering the offense with the state secret), it is so hard to imagine why there is interest in monitoring and study of these activities at a considerable impact on the environment and human?
legal that you object to these dati, lecito che non si condivida, lecito che si simpatizzi per l’incenerimento, ma come segnalato dall’Ordine dei medici di Modena“ l'incertezza scientifica non deve e non può costituire un ostacolo insormontabile per l'accertamento della responsabilità penale, perché la certezza scientifica è un risultato raramente raggiungibile.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment