Lodo Alfano, tax shelter, short trial, such failure, Decree save them ..... for the words of Blaise Pascal :
"Democracy: Since it could not make what is right would be strong, he made sure that what was right is strong."
force of law or law of force? It is not a paraphrase, rather it is the heart of what we in the legal field is an old dilemma of trying to move the act of legislating from the right context. The 'most problematic aspect is not to make a law, but to ensure that it meets the right "owner" means the power or democracy.
Since the law is a powerful tool, the real question is by whom it is used, the word is difficult to establish if at that time that is enslaving the justice or rule of force.
In the first case if it responds to an ideal of justice (and this in itself is not simple because there is no absolute justice) then there is some chance that, moving while maintaining the democratic defend equally the rights of anyone in a civil relation, if it responds to the force, then, becomes a limitation of liberty, a violation of democratic space, an abuse of power on anyone who is dissenting, half savage violence to impose views and values \u200b\u200bso weak that force alone would not be able to take root and ideological to be shared.
The feeling is that the product of recent legislation is providing a service to its strengths rather than to justice ....... what to say, expect a return to the primordial and savage world in which civilization devolves to the ancestral size of the fittest will survive where Darwinian who boasts the largest adaptive arrogance in all fields ... also the moral.
force of law or law of force? It is not a paraphrase, rather it is the heart of what we in the legal field is an old dilemma of trying to move the act of legislating from the right context. The 'most problematic aspect is not to make a law, but to ensure that it meets the right "owner" means the power or democracy.
Since the law is a powerful tool, the real question is by whom it is used, the word is difficult to establish if at that time that is enslaving the justice or rule of force.
In the first case if it responds to an ideal of justice (and this in itself is not simple because there is no absolute justice) then there is some chance that, moving while maintaining the democratic defend equally the rights of anyone in a civil relation, if it responds to the force, then, becomes a limitation of liberty, a violation of democratic space, an abuse of power on anyone who is dissenting, half savage violence to impose views and values \u200b\u200bso weak that force alone would not be able to take root and ideological to be shared.
The feeling is that the product of recent legislation is providing a service to its strengths rather than to justice ....... what to say, expect a return to the primordial and savage world in which civilization devolves to the ancestral size of the fittest will survive where Darwinian who boasts the largest adaptive arrogance in all fields ... also the moral.
0 comments:
Post a Comment