Il ricorrente dilemma se per essere buoni medici si debba essere esperti tecnici o profondi conoscitori dell’ animo umano, è ormai uno scoglio su cui ci infrangiamo tutti prima o poi una volta intrapreso il percorso della medicina.
Il fatto è che come al solito si pensa that to be a qualified doctor should be or just a purist technical or only of humanity, that only one or the other can offer a valuable service, but the error is this extremism, this wanting to be just one thing, to think that only one type of quality we can do well in helping the sick.
In fact you can not separate the two things, serve one another. We are not machines, as we are not only emotion and feeling, we are an inseparable mix of physicality and emotion.
The patient should be treated in its entirety as a man, using the mastery of the craft, the practice of 'essential technique too, but with respect for privacy, his personal history and with the humility in the approach to what, for some experts, is only events "seen live" but "lived".
You can not be only technical, as you can not only be healers of emotional torment.
How Terzani said "doctor fix" that simply try and replace the diseased part can not only treat the patient, must also provide for man and for this you do not need unnatural or unusual qualities qualities, you just need to have the respect that should not detract from the doctor, however expert, with which this report is not a static simulation, not a mathematical set of parameters to be corrected, but a human being living , thinks, feels and suffers. This is enough to keep track of humanity, are not innate qualities or transcendental, but that 'humane than many who reached the title leaving behind everything.
The only thing for sure, however, in this dimension is not a judge. The only thing the patient can do without is that someone who stands to observer, and that superiority with lapidary believes he can identify lifestyle and disease, a tool to label his patient, classified as a therapy worth it or not.
As a doctor I have to treat the patient at all times, regardless of whether he had a perfect life or questionable, if honest or dishonest, regardless of vices and virtues, race, religion, color of socks, folds of hair. My job is in the best way to take care of any patient and in any case he is.
At the end I must not judge, I have to help, this is the difference and to help I do not need to know how this man was wrong in his life, but to help correct what at that moment is causing damage.
L 'more rational approach should be made with a moderation that must be preserved by posting sleazy as the pitiful pity and morbid and disrespectful encroachment, but above all, and certainly far from judgments, judgments and moralism.
Il fatto è che come al solito si pensa that to be a qualified doctor should be or just a purist technical or only of humanity, that only one or the other can offer a valuable service, but the error is this extremism, this wanting to be just one thing, to think that only one type of quality we can do well in helping the sick.
In fact you can not separate the two things, serve one another. We are not machines, as we are not only emotion and feeling, we are an inseparable mix of physicality and emotion.
The patient should be treated in its entirety as a man, using the mastery of the craft, the practice of 'essential technique too, but with respect for privacy, his personal history and with the humility in the approach to what, for some experts, is only events "seen live" but "lived".
You can not be only technical, as you can not only be healers of emotional torment.
How Terzani said "doctor fix" that simply try and replace the diseased part can not only treat the patient, must also provide for man and for this you do not need unnatural or unusual qualities qualities, you just need to have the respect that should not detract from the doctor, however expert, with which this report is not a static simulation, not a mathematical set of parameters to be corrected, but a human being living , thinks, feels and suffers. This is enough to keep track of humanity, are not innate qualities or transcendental, but that 'humane than many who reached the title leaving behind everything.
The only thing for sure, however, in this dimension is not a judge. The only thing the patient can do without is that someone who stands to observer, and that superiority with lapidary believes he can identify lifestyle and disease, a tool to label his patient, classified as a therapy worth it or not.
As a doctor I have to treat the patient at all times, regardless of whether he had a perfect life or questionable, if honest or dishonest, regardless of vices and virtues, race, religion, color of socks, folds of hair. My job is in the best way to take care of any patient and in any case he is.
At the end I must not judge, I have to help, this is the difference and to help I do not need to know how this man was wrong in his life, but to help correct what at that moment is causing damage.
L 'more rational approach should be made with a moderation that must be preserved by posting sleazy as the pitiful pity and morbid and disrespectful encroachment, but above all, and certainly far from judgments, judgments and moralism.
0 comments:
Post a Comment